Causes, Concerns and Management of Vascularization and Neovascularization

Authors

  • J.E. Josephson
  • B.E. Caffery

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65636/cjo.v50i1.6945

Keywords:

Vascularization, neovascularization, contact lens

Abstract

One of the complications of contact lens wear that is often talked about yet poorly defined is corneal vascularization. Cos­metic contact lens wear is designed to enhance sight and ideally should not interfere with the natural physiology of the eye. Any change in normal clarity of the cornea including new growth of vessels is considered an adverse response and is an unwanted finding in any con­tact lens wearer. The affected corneal tissues are prone to opacification by lipid deposition1. In addition, these vascular­izated corneas have a higher rate of graft rejection because of the presence of immunological substances associated with vascularization2. Vascularized cor­neas are subject to bleeds if trauma occurs. If vascular growth is allowed to continue, the vessels may cover the visual axis and cause loss of vision, although this is very rare3.

References

1. Klintworth G.K. and Burger P.C. Neovas­ cularization of the cornea: Current Con­cepts of its Pathogenisis. Int. Ophthalmol Clin 1983; 23(1): 27.

2. Rahia, S. and Garner A. Immunopa­thology of the Eye. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications 1976; 125-147.

3. Martin M. F. Extended Wear Soft Contact Lenses for Aphakic Correction, Arch Ophrhalmol 1983; 39: IOI.

4. McMonnies C.W., Chapman-Davies A. and Holden B.A. The vascular response to contact lens wear Am J Oprom Physiol Opr 1982; 59: 795-9.

5. Campbell F.W. and Michaelson J.C. Blood Vessel Formation in the Cornea. Br J Ophrhalmol 1949: 3: 248.

6. Cogan D.G. Vascularization of the Cornea. Arch Ophrhalmol 1949; 41: 406.

7. Ashton H. and Cook C. Mechanism of Corneal Vascularization. Br J Ophrhalmol 1953; 37: 193.

8. Michaelson J.C. Unilateral Budding in New Vessel Formation in the Eye. Br J Ophthalmol 1956: 40: 346.

9. Maurice D. M., Zauberman H. and Michaelson LC. The Stimulus to Neovas­cularization in the Cornea. Exp Eye Res 1966; 5: 168.

10. Klintwork G.K. The Hamster Cheek Pouch. Am J Path 1973; 73: 891.

11. Larke J.R., Humphreys J.A., Holmes R. Apparent Corneal Neovascularization in Soft Lens Wearers. J Br CL Assoc 1981; 4: 105-106.

12. Zauberman H., Michaelson J.C., Bergman F., and Maurice D. M. Stimula­tion of Neovascularization of the Cornea by Biogenic Amines. Exp Eye Res 1969; 8: 77-83.

13. Collin H.B. Limbal Vascularization Response Prior to Corneal Vasculariza­tion. Exp Eye Res 1973; 16: 443-445.

14. Thoft R. and Friend J. Biochemical Aspects of Contact Lens Wear. Am J Ophthalmol 1975; 80(1): 139-145.

15. Henkind P. Ocular Neovascularization. Am J Ophrhalmol 1978; 85: 287-301.

16. Josephson J.E. and Caffery B.E. Case Report: Progressive Corneal Vasculariza­tion in a Patient Wearing a Silicone Elastomer Contact Lens on an Extended Wear Basis, In Press. Am J Optom and Phys Opt 1987.

17. lmre G. The Rule of Increased Lactic Acid Concentration in Neovascularization. Ac1a Morph Hung 1984; 32(2): 97-103.

18. Levene R .. Shapiro A. and Baum J. Experimental Corneal Vascularization. Arch Ophthalmol 1963; 70: 242.

19. Morley N. and McCulloch C. Corneal Lactate and Pyridine, Neucleotides with Contact Lenses. Ar h Ophrhalmol 1961: 66: 379.

20. Mertz G.W. and Holden B.A. Clinical Implications of Extended Wear Research. Can J Oprom Suppl: Trans of Can. Optom C. L. Soc .. July 1981, pp 203-204.

21. Vannas A. Neovascularization of Contact Lens Wearers. Com Lens J July, 1981.

22. Robin J .. Regis-Pacheco L., Kash R. and Schanzlin D. The Histopathology of Cor­neal Vascularization. Arch Ophtha/1110/ 1985; 103: 284.

23. Duffin R.M .. Weissman B.A., Glasser D.B. and Pettit T.M. Flurbiprotin in the Treatment of Corneal Neovascularization Induced by Contact Lenses. Am J Oph1halmol 1982; 93: 607-614.

24. Cooper C.A .. Bergamini M.VW. and Leopold I. H. Use of Flurbiprofin to Inhibit Corneal Neovascularization. Arch Ophrhalmol 1980; 98: 1102.

25. BenEzra D. Neovasculogenesis: Trig­gering Factors in Possible Mechanisms. Surv Ophthalmol 1979; 24: 167.

26. lnomata H .. Smelser G.K. and Polack F. M. Corneal Vascularization in Experimental Uveitis and Graft Rejection. Inv Oph1halmol 1971; 10: 840-850.

27. Fromer C.H. and Klintworth G.K. An Evaluation in the Role of Leukocytes in the Pathogenesis of Experimentally Induced Corneal Vascularization: III Studies Related to the Baso-Peripherative Capability of Polymorphonuclear Leuko­cytes and Lymphocytes. Am J Parh 1976; 82: 1570167.

28. BenEzra D. Mediators of Immunological Reactions: Function as Inducers of Neovascularization. Merab Ophrhalmol 1978; 2: 339-341.

29. Klintworth G.K. The Hamster Cheek Pouch. An Experimental Model of Cor­neal Vascularization. Am J Ptah 1973; 73:

691-703.

30. McMonnies CW. Contact Lens Jnduced Corneal Vascularization ICLC 1983; 10(1): 12.

31. Josephson J.E. and Caffery B.E. Infiltra­tive Keratitis in Hydrogel Lens Wear. ICLC 1979: 6: 223.

32. Rochels R. Tierexperimentelle Uter­suchungen Zur Rolle Von Entzundungs­med iatoren Bei Der Hornhaut Neovaskularisation. Doc Ophrlralmol 1984; 57: 215.

33. Ashton N. Neovascularization in Ocular Disease. Tmns Ophthalmol Soc UK 1961; 81: 145.

34. Duke-Elder S. and Lee A.G. System of Ophthalmology Volume VITI. Diseases of the Outer Eye, Part 2, London, Henry Kimpton, 1965; 676-691.

35. Stark W.J. and Martin N.F. Extended Wear Contact Lenses for Myopic Correc­tion. Arch Ophthalmol 1981; 99: 1963.

36. The Hydrocurve Extended Wear Study, 1977-1983, Report presented to H.P.B. Canada. 1983.

37. Athanassiadia P. and Ruben M. The Con­tinuous Wear of Contact Lenses. The Opti­cian. May 26, 1979; 390.

38. Slan BJ. and Stein H. Extended Wear Soft Contact Lenses in Preservative. ICLC 1977, September/October; 35.

39. Solomon O.D., Sholiton D., Slonim C. and Lamping K. Bausch & Lomb "O" Lenses for Extended Wear. CUO 1983; 9(2): 137.

40. Schonder A., Conklin T. and Angelini E. Clinical Evaluation of Extended Wear Lidofilcon B Contact Lenses with Aphakia. Am J Ophrhalmol 1982; 14(10): 222.

41. Stark W., Krucher G., Covan C., Taylor H. et al. Extended Wear Contact Lenses and lntraocular Lenses for Aphakic Cor­rection. Am J Oph1halmol 1979; 88(3) 11: 535.

42. Binder P. Myopic Extended Wear with Hydrocurve U Soft Contact Lenses. Opluhalmol 1983; 60(7): 578.

43. Hill J.F., Anderson F.L., Johnson, Regelle and Seelye R.R. Am J Opzom and Phys Op 1983; 60(7): 578.

44. Sak J. and Schlanger J. Complications of Aphakic Extended Wear Contact Lenses Encountered During a Seven Year Period on 100 Eyes. CUO 1983; 9(3): 241.

45. McMonnies C.W. and Chapman-Davies A. Assessment of Conjunctiva! Hypermia in Contact Lens Wearers. Part 11. Am J Optom Physiol Ope 1987; 64(4): 251-255.

46. Ruben M. Quoted in Ophthalmic Op1i­cian, March 29, 1980: 226.

47. Lane I. Quoted in Ophrhalmic Optician, March 29, 1980: 226.

48. Stain G.A., Brightbill F.S., Holm P. and Laux D. The Development of Pseudop­terygia in Hard Contact Lens Wearers. Com Inrra Oc lens Med J 1981; 7: I.

49. Mosquera J.M., Voss E.H., and Moguilner M.J. Corneal Angiography and Contact Lenses. ICLC 1974; 1: 94-98.

50. Mandelbaum J. Corneal Vascularization in Aphakic Eyes Following the Use of Contact Lenses. Arch OpJ11halmol 1964; 71: 633-635.

51. Ullen R.L. Corneal Vascularization in the Wearing of Contact Lenses. Precision Cosme! Digest, Precision Cosme! Com­pany Minniapolis 1963, 3(1): 1-6: 3(10): 1-5.

52. Dixon J.M. Corneal Vascularization and Corneal Contact Lenses: The Clinica.I Pic­ture. Trans Am Acad Oplulralmol Soc 1967; 65: 333-340.

53. Goldberg J.B. Biomicroscopy for Contact lens Practice, Chicago, Professional Press, 1971: 50-51.

Published

2026-06-04

How to Cite

Josephson, J., & Caffery, B. (2026). Causes, Concerns and Management of Vascularization and Neovascularization. Canadian Journal of Optometry, 50(1), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.65636/cjo.v50i1.6945

Issue

Section

Original Research