Chemical soaking solutions versus hydrogen peroxide for soft lens disinfection: Is there a significant difference?

1. Health Protection Branch, Health and Welfare Canada. Information Letter #774, February 20, 1990.

2. Testing Guidelines for class Ill soft (hydrophilic) contact lens solutions. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Dept of Health and Human Services, United Stares Food and Drug Administration 1985;44-55.

3. Janoff LE. Origin and development of hydrogen peroxide disinfection systems. CLAO J 1990;16:S30-42.

4. Penley CA, Llabres C, Wilson LA, Ahearn DG. Efficacy of hydrogen peroxide disinfection systems for soft contact lenses contaminated with fungi. CLAO J 1985;11:65-8.

5. Reinhardt DJ. Kaylor B, Presscott D, Sapps CS. Rapid and simplified comparative evaluations of contact lens disinfecting solutions. JCLC 1990;17-9-12.

6. Anger CB, Ambrus K, Stoeker J, et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of hydrogen peroxide for contact lens disinfection. Contact Lens Spectrum 1990;501):46--51.

7. Davies DJG, Anthony Y, Meakin BJ, et al. Evaluation of the antiacanthamoeba activity of five contact lens disinfectants. lCLC 1990;17:14-20.

8. Penley CA, Willis SW, Sickler SG. Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of soft and rigid gas permeable contact lens solutions against acanthamoeba. CLAO J 1989;15:257--o0.

9. Holden BA. Report card on hydrogen peroxide for contact lens disinfection. CI.AO J 1990;16:S61-64.

10. Levine Wl, Litsky W, Lamm RA. Disinfection of hydrophilic contact lenses with commercial preparations of 3% and 6% hydrogen peroxide. Dev Ind Microbiol 1981;22:813-19.

11. Campbell JE, Dimick RL. Effect of 3% hydrogen peroxide on the viability of Serratia marcescens. J Bacteriol ]966;91:925-29.

12. Lowe R, Brennan NA. Hydrogen peroxide disinfection of hydrogel contact lenses: an overview. Clin Exp Optom 1987;70:190-97.

13. Mowrey-McKee MF, Busschaert SC, Hamberger J, et al. A comparison of bacterial death rate kinetics among contact lens solutions. Presented at 89th meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, New Orleans. LA, May 1989.

14. Sutton SVY/, Franco RJ, Porter DA, et al. D-value determinations are an inappropriate measure of disinfecting activity of common contact lens disinfecting solutions. Appl Environ Microbiol 1991 ;57:2021-26.

15. Lowe R, Vallas V, Brennan NA. Comparative efficacy of contact lens disinfecting solutions. CLAO J 1992;18:34-40.

16. Janoff LE. The Sept icon TM system: a review of pertinent scientific data. ICLC 1984:11:274-79.

17. Sibley M. Hudrogen peroxide care systems. Contact Lens Forum 1987;12(7}57-63.

18. Houlsby R, Ghajar M, Chavez G. Microbiological evaluation of soft contact lens disinfecting solutions. J Am Optom Assoc 1984;55:205-11.

19. Reindel Y/T, Huber JM. Proskin HM. Multipurpose products-The patient's preference. Contact Lens forum 1989;14(9):67-72.

20. Leisring J, Gill L. The clinical safety of a new generation chemical disinfecting agent. Contact Lens Spectrum 1990;5(10):63--{>7.

21. Schachet J, Lowther GE, Lavaux JE, el al. Clinical evaluation of the Opti-Free disinfection system. Contact Lens Spectrum 1990;5(12):37-41.

22. Roth HW. Polyquad induced mixed solution syndrome in contact lens wear. Contactologia 1991;13;8-ll.

23. Campbell RC, Caroline PJ. lnefficacy of soft contact lens disinfection techniques in the home environment. Contact lens Forum 1990;15(9):17-26.

24. Pitts RE. Krachmer JH. Evaluation of soft contact lenses in the home environment. Arch Ophthalmol 1979;97:470-72.

25 Caroline PJ. Campbell RC. Strategies of microbial cell survival in contact lens cases. Contact Lens Forum 1990; 15(10):27-36.

26. Poggio EC, Glynn RJ, Schein OD, et al. The incidence of ulcerative keratitis among users of daily-wear and extended wear soft contact lenses. N Engl J Med 1989;321(12):779-83.

27. Chou MH, DeCiccio BT, Keevan JK. er al. The mechanism of survival of bacteria in contact lenses cases. Presented at the Contact lens Association of Ophthalmologists meeting, New Orleans, LA, January 1989.

28. Simmons PA, Edrington TB, Hsieh L, Wang LW. The incidence of bacterial contamination in contact lens case caps and wells: A comparison among cold chemical disinfection systems. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67(supp):70.

29. Wilson LA, Sawant Ad, Ahearn DG. Comparative efficacies of soft contact lens disinfectant solutions against microbial films in lens cases. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;108:11 55-57.

30. Janoff LE. The effective disinfection of soft contact lenses using hydrogen peroxide. Contacto 1979;23:37-40.

31. Paugh JR, Brennan NA, Efron N. Ocular response ro hydrogen peroxide. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;65:91-98.

32. Chalmers RL, McNally JJ. Ocular detection threshold for hydrogen peroxide: drops vs. lenses. JCLC 1988;15:351-57.

33. Chalmers RL, Tsao M, Scott G, Roth L. The rate of in vivo neutralisation of residual l-1202 from hydrogel lenses. Contact Lens Specu-um 1989;4(7):21-26.

34. Kelly W, Ward G, Williams W, Dziabo A. Eliminating hydrogen peroxide residuals in solutions and contact lenses. Contact Lens Spectrum 1990;5(1):41-44.

35. Harris MG. Practical considerations in the use of hydrogen peroxide disinfection systems. CLAO J 1990;16:S53--o0,

36. Krezanoski JZ, Houlsby RD. A comparison of new hydrogen peroxide disinfection systems. J Am Optom Assoc 1988;59:193-97.

37. Gyulai P, Dziabo A, Kelly W, et al. Relative neutralisation ability of six hydrogen peroxide disinfection systems. Contact Lens Spectrum 1987;2(5):61-68.

38. Sibley MJ. Hydrogen peroxide residues. Contact Lens Spectrum 1988;3(8):39-43.

39. Melton JY/, Phillips JH. Patient comfort comparison of hydrogen peroxide systems. Contact Lens Spectrum 1988;3(9):48-51.

40. Riley MV, Kast M. Penetration of hydrogen peroxide from contact lenses or tear-side solutions into the aqueous humor. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:546--51.

41. Spector A. Garner WH. Hydrogen peroxide and human cataract. Exp Eye Res 1981 ;33:673-81.

42. Hull DS. Csukas S, Green K, Livingston V. Hydrogen peroxide and corneal endothelium. Acta Ophthal mol 1981;59:409-21.

43. Tripathi BJ, Tripathi RC. Hydrogen peroxide damage to human corneal epithelial cells in vitro. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:1516--19.

44. Peterson NB. Allergic contact conjunctivitis from merthiolate in soft contact lenses. Contact Dermatitis 1978;4:165.

45. Shaw EL. Allergies induced by contact lens solution. Contact lntraocular Lens Med J 1980;6:273-77.

46 Josephson J, Caffery B. Hydrogel lens solutions. International Ophthalmol Clin 1981;21(2):163-71.

47. Sokol JL, Mier MG, Bloom S, Asbell PA. A study of patient compliance in a contact lens wearing population. CLAO J 1990;16:209-13.

48. Chun MW, X7eissman BA. Compliance in contact lens care. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987;64:274-76.

49. Collins MJ, Carney LG. Patient compliance and its influence on contact lens wearing problems. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986;63:952-56.

50. Donzis PB, Mondino BJ, Weissman B, Bruckner DA. Microbial contamination of contact lens care systems. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;104:325-33.

51. Donzis PB, Mondino BJ, Weissman BA, Bruckner DA. Microbial analysis of contact lens care systems contaminated with Acanthamoeba. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 108:53-56.

52. Wilson LA, Sawant AD, Simmons RB, Ahearn DG. Microbial contamination of contact lens storage cases and solutions. Am J Ophthalmol 1990;110:193-98.

53. Moore MB. Acanthamoeba keratitis and contact lens wear: the patient is at fault. Cornea 1990;9:S33-35.

54. Efron , Wohl A, Toma NG, et al. Pseudomonas corneal ulcers associated with daily wear of disposable hydrogel contact lenses. ICLC 1991;18:46-52.

55. Eisen SA, Miller DK, Woodward RS, et al. The effect of prescribed daily dose frequency on patient medication compliance. Arch Intern Med 1990;150:1881-84.

56. Schwartz CA. Drive to simplify systems, ensure efficacy marks developments. Contact Lens Forum 1989:14(9):21-32.

57. Hammersla K, Coviello D. The consumer challenge: three care systems compared. Contact Lens Spectrum 1991;6(6):21-27.

58. Steel S. Patient preference study compares top lens care systems. Contact Lens Spectn1m 1990;5(10):56-59.