Mesure de l'acuité visuelle par la technique du regard préférentiel : Revue des méthodes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65636/cjo.v54i1.7172Keywords:
preferential looking, visual acuity, infants, acuity cardsAbstract
Preferential looking methods efficientfy measure the visual acuity of infants and developmentally delayed subjects. The procedures use grids as stimuli and do not require any verbal response from the subjects. Early preferential looking methods for the assessment of visual acuity relied upon formal, statistically rigorous, psychophysical procedures that were lengthy and could be easily applied only in laboratory studies. From a clinical point of view, Tellet acuity cards are very interesting. They are easy to handle and they give good results in less than five minutes. However, they are not as statistically rigorous as traditional preferential looking techniques.
References
1. Rosner J. Pediatric Optometry. Boston: Butterworths, 1982.
2. McDonald MA. Assessment of visual acuity in toddlers. Surv Ophthalmol 1986;31(3): 189-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6257(86)90039-1
3. Westheimer G. Visual acuaity. In: Moses R, ed. Adler's Physiology of the eye: CV Mosby, 1987:415-28.
4. Dobson V, Teller DY. Visual acuity in human infants. A review and comparison of behavioral and electrophysiological studies. Vision Res 1978;18:1469-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(78)90001-9
5. Sebris SL, Dobson V, McDonald MA, Teller DY. Acuity cards for visual acuity assessment of infants and children in clinical settings. Clin Vis Sci 1987;2:45-48.
6. Fantz RL. Pattern vision in young infants. Psychol Rec 1958;58:43-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393306
7. Dobson V. Behavioral tests of visual acuity in infant. Electrophysiology Psychophysics Int Clin 1980;20:233-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00004397-198002010-00011
8. Fulton A, Hansen R, Manning K. Measuring visual acuity in infants. Surv Ophthalmol 1981;25(5):325-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6257(81)90158-2
9. Birch E, Hale L, Stager D, Fuller D, Birch D. Operant acuity of toddlers and developmentally delayed children with low vision. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1987; 24(2):64-{'i9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/0191-3913-19870301-04
10. Grochowicki M, Bongrand M, Gay C, Tavernier F. Vital Durand F, Rougier J. Technique du regard préférentiel chez le nourrisson. Présentation de la méthode. Bull Soc Ophth France 1984;6-7:861-63
11. Held R, Gwiazda J, Brill S, Mohindra I, Wolfe I. Infant visual acuity is underestimated because near threshold gradings are not preferentially fixated. Vision Res 1979; 19:1377-79, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(79)90210-4
12. Levy B. Incidence of oculo-visual anomalies in an adult population of mentally retarded person. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1984;61(5):324-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198405000-00006
13. Mayer LD, Dobson V. Assessment of vision in young children: a new operant approach yields estimates of acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1980;19(3):566-70.
14. Laurin, L. Mesure de l'acuite visuelle par la technique du regard préférentiel chez des enfants handicapes intellectuellement. Mémoire de maîtrise en optique physiologique, Université de Montreal, 1989.
15. Bonnet C. Manuel pratique de psychophysique. Paris: Armand Colin, 1986.
16. McKee SP, Klein SA, Teller DY. Statistics properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis. Perc Psych 1985;37(4):286-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211350
17. Vital-Durand F, Conard M. La technique du regard préférentiel : matériel et procédure de bebe vision. J Fr Ophthalmol 1985:8(3):267-72.
18. Gwiazda J, Wolfe J, Brill S, Mohindra I, Held R. Quick assessment of preferential looking acuity in infants. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1980;57(7):420-27 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198007000-00003
19. Jacobson SG, Mohindra I, Held R. Visual acuity of infants with ocular diseases. Am J Ophthalmol 1982;93(2): 198-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9394(82)90415-9
20. McDonald MA, Dobson V, Sebris SL, Bairh L, Varner D, Teller DY. The acuity card procedure: A rapid rest of infant acuity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26(8):1158-62.
21. Vital-Durand F, Hullo A. Cinq cents examens d’acuité visuelle du nourisson avec les canes d’acuité de Teller. Ophtalmologie 1990;4:208-11.
22. Teller DY, McDonald M, Preston K, Sebris SL, Dobson V. Assessment of visual acuity in infants and children: The acuity card procedure. Devel Med Child Neurol 1986; 28:779-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1986.tb03932.x
23. Thompson C, Drasdo N. Clinical experience with preferential looking acuity tests in infants and young children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1988;8:309-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.1988.tb01060.x
24. McDonald MA, Sebris SL, Mohn G, Teller D, Dobson V. Monocular acuity in normal infants: The acuity card procedure. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986a;63(2):127-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198602000-00008
25. McDonald MA, Ankrum C, Preston K, Sebris SL Monocular and binocular acuity estimation in 18- to 36-month-olds: Acuity card results. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986b; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198603000-00003
26. Mohn G, van Hof-van Duin J, Fener WPF, deGroot L, Hage M. Acuity assessment of non-verbal infants and children: clinical experience with the acuity card procedure. Devel Med Child Neurol 1988;30:232--44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1988.tb04756.x
27. Dobson V, Carpenter NA, Bonvalot K, Bossler J. The acuity card procedure: interobserver agreement in infants with perinatal complications. Clin Vis Sci 1990a;6(1):39-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/NAVS.1991.MB1
28. Dobson V, Quinn GE, Biglan AW, Tung B, Flynn JT, Palmer EA. Acuity card assessment of visual function in the cryotherapy for retinopathy of prematurity trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990b;31(9):1702-8.
29. Katz B, Sireteanu R. The Teller acuity card test: a useful method for the clinical routine? Clin Vis Sci 1990;5(4):307-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0275-5408(89)90299-8
30. Schmidt PP. Effectiveness of vision-screening in pre-school populations with preferential-looking cards used for assessment of visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68(3):210-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-199103000-00009
31. McDonald MA, Chaudiy NM. Comparison of four methods of assessing visual acuity in young children. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66(6):363-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-9235.1989.tb02278.x
32. Committee on Vision. Recommended standard procedures for the clinical measurement and specification of visual acuity. Adv Ophthalmol 1980;41:103-48.
33. Mayer DL, Fulton AB. Preferential looking grating acuities of infants at risk amblyopia. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1985;104:903-11.
34. Ellis GS, Hartmann E, Lova a, May J, Morgan KS. Teller acuity cards versus clinical judgement in the diagnosis of amblyopia with strabismus. Ophthalmol 1988;95(6):788-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(88)33105-2
35. Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1970;49(2):467-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912375
36. Duckman RH, Selenow a. Use of forced preferential looking measurement of visual acuity in a population of neurologically impaired children. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983;60(10):817-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198310000-00002
37. Lundi BL. Two years’ clinical experience with the preferential looking technique for visual acuity determination in infants and young children. Acta Ophthalmol 1986;64:674-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-3768.1986.tb00685.x
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
